There are red and blue lines, but I should look at the red one, right?
Yes. The standard was changed a few years ago, reflecting the results of extensive experimentation. 1000 Hz is the standard, for example, 40 phon *1 Looking at this line, you can see that the sound pressure level at 1000 Hz is 40 dB, while at 125 Hz it's around 60 dB, and at 63 Hz it's around 73 dB.
So, to hear a sound at 1000 Hz with a volume of 40 dB as loud, you would need to hear it at 125 Hz with a sound pressure level 20 dB higher, and at 63 Hz with a sound pressure level about 33 dB higher.
That's right. But the point that Oto noticed was that when he changed the volume, it felt like the balance between the high and low notes changed.
Yes. So, in this graph, we can compare the 40 phon line with, for example, the 80 phon line.
In an 80 phon line, the sound pressure level at 1000 Hz is 80 dB, and at 125 Hz, it's 90 dB, both at the same volume. Since the difference was 20 dB in the 40 phon line, there's now a 10 dB difference.
Conversely, sounds with frequencies higher than 1000 Hz aren't affected much by the volume. So that's why the low frequencies seemed to become particularly loud when the volume was turned up.
That's right. The A-weighting characteristic of noise levels, a frequency-weighted characteristic, uses a 40dB sound as a representative example of the most likely sound level in everyday noise, and employs an almost inverse characteristic of the equal-loudness characteristics of a 40 phon pure tone to compensate for perceived loudness. This has been used for many years since the 1930s as an evaluation value for noise. *2
Has it really been in use for that long?
That's right. It's a testament to its excellent performance rating. It's amazing that such a complex sense of sound volume can be expressed with a single numerical value.
But since 40 dB is the baseline, the noise levels for sounds quieter or louder than that will not match our perception of how loud the sound is.
That's right. Not only that, but the volume of the sound is also related to the masking effect we talked about a while ago.
That's right. I'd like to hear more about that sometime.